New Page!

This -- from the Rachel Maddow show last night -- is exactly where we are in the impeachment process right now:

"Ask yourself why no facts favorable to the president have leaked from the Republican side. It's not because they don't leak. It's because there aren't any." -Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney pic.twitter.com/BDFWb9oVYc

— Maddow Blog (@MaddowBlog) October 25, 2019

There are no facts favorable to Donald Trump. There are 46 Republicans sitting in on these interviews. They have not leaked anything favorable to the President because there is nothing favorable to leak. The House, meanwhile, continues its investigation, interviewing witnesses and collecting evidence, as it prepares to open the impeachment inquiry up to the public in mid-November, as the Republicans have demanded. The Republicans are probably going to wish that they had not, because at the moment, they cannot argue the facts. They can only argue process, which is why we've seen the House Republicans storm secure rooms and Lindsey Graham put forward a meaningless symbolic motion to censure the House.

When the Democrats take away that process argument, the Republicans will be left trying to defend Trump on the merits, as career diplomat after career diplomat appears before the House -- and on our television screens -- to describe what happened. Trump, at the moment, is trying to smear career bureaucrats as either radical Democrats or Never Trumpers, which he refers to "human scum." That's going to be a lot more difficult to do when our televisions put a face to "human scum."

Eventually, this is going to put Republicans in the Senate in an awkward position. We all know what they'll do: They'll find one small, meaningless inconsistency with one witness, or find texts between a diplomat and his or her lover and blow it way out of proportion in an effort to distract the public from the actual merits of the impeachment case. But how many times can they do that? At some point, the overwhelming evidence from an overwhelming number of non-partisan officials is going to overwhelm the Republicans in the Senate.

Those moderate Republican Senators facing re-election in 2020 in swing states? They're already screwed, and they know it. From the Times:

It has tightened the squeeze they were already feeling between a political base that demands unquestioning loyalty to Mr. Trump, and the moderate swing voters who may very well decide their elections. And it is one reason that support for the president in the Republican-led Senate appears to be subtly softening, a phenomenon that some of his own advisers fear that Mr. Trump does not fully appreciate.

Those swing-state Senators, in addition to Senators who are not seeking re-election (or who do not face re-election until 2024) could theoretically form a block big enough to pull the trigger on convicting Trump. In doing so, they might not only save their own reputations, they'd ultimately save the rest of the Republican Senate, which does not like Trump but cannot risk going against him politically.

Even Senate Republicans who have publicly supported the President are being thrown under the bus for not doing enough, and that's also rattled some Trump defenders in the Senate. From The Daily Beast:

"It's exhausting and they don't know what they don't know in terms of where this is going," the operative added.

Other aides said that they found the attacks from Trump-allied operatives to be counterproductive.

"It's an interesting strategy," a senior Senate GOP aide told The Daily Beast, "to attack Republican senators after they try to defend you."

The friction between Senate Republicans and Trumpworld operatives could complicate an already extremely dicey situation for the White House as it tries to hold party members in line. Publicly, many GOP lawmakers in the Senate remain supportive of the president. But their declarations of support have become notably more cautious and few seemed willing to endorse the idea that they should be using their committees and offices to give Trump more cover.

Ultimately, this is all going to come down to the Republican Senate. And maybe they don't vote to convict Trump, but maybe they do enough damage to themselves that the Republicans lose their majority in the Senate next year. If Democrats can take back the White House, we could be looking at a 2021 where a progressive candidate actually could come in and make sweeping reforms with the full back of the House and Senate.

That is assuming, of course, that we still have a Democracy left to protect.

A couple of quick other notes:

-- Summer Zervos, the former The Apprentice contestant suing Trump for defaming her after she accused him of sexual assault, is mounting a good deal of evidence proving, at the very least, that both she and Trump were in the same place at the time that the "alleged" sexual assault took place.

-- And on the foreign policy front? This is nuts:

So we are clear. This is nuts. We are abandoning our allies, abetting ethnic cleansing, allowing ISIS prisoners to be released, then we are going to protect oil fields hundreds of miles away? This is logistically crazy, strategically upside down, and morally bankrupt. https://t.co/rYrHjceFww

— Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) October 24, 2019